Talking about the failure of SMEs is not only uncomfortable, but also painful, embarrassing and difficult to address, as it involves listing a long series of economic and social repercussions at the time of the deal. The reasons for the closure of a negotiation are diverse, complex and to a certain extent understandable, however, directors have a great responsibility in their hands.
The reality is that their owners are the ones who create, develop and end their own businesses; they are part of the failure of SMEs.
The decisions of the directors are based, to a greater or lesser extent, on the factors that intervene in this, such as knowledge, experience and in many cases the intuition they have about the messages sent by the industry, consumption patterns and other environmental patterns that surround the environment of their company. The interesting thing about the case is that the management takes credit for such messages, justifies and bases ill-considered decisions, decreeing, limiting and closing the possibilities of improvement, challenge and change, thanks to the arrogance and selfishness of not listening to alternatives for improvement from internal or external advice. I recommend you read: The commercial repercussions in SMEs due to the lack of an electronic transformation in Mexico .
Unfortunately, in Mexico we constantly see the failure of SMEs. We do not have hungary phone number a business culture with the necessary openness to request the help of business experts, since there are a series of paradigms that are not at all positive, which prevent such openness from occurring and contribute to the rescue of the SME that sinks more and more day after day. I share with you the following article: Internal Communication, a fundamental piece of business culture
Personally, I have seen that business chambers are only a moral figure and do not fulfill any role in improving companies, and they provide training courses and advice out of time.
Owners' decisions, a fundamental element for the failure of SMEs
On the other hand, the company matures according to the evolution of the age of the management, however there is a point where the organization should not be condemned before the decline of the owner who sharpens his position by defending the position and leadership style, which forged his company for years, so the management chooses to challenge those who question the validity of the decisions taken. You may be interested in learning more about: The Toxic Leader: its effect on the organizational environment
15 days ago, we were with a food company that makes tamales. The company said: “If I hadn’t been arrogant… the company would be in very bad shape…” to which I had the audacity to smile and contradict him by saying: “character, drive and good decisions are one thing, and narrow-mindedness is another thing, which will condemn your company to continue the same or die.” I then took my briefcase, said goodbye and left the company.